Go Back   Singapore's Online Community - Singapore Forums > Current Affairs > Local Affairs
Register FAQ Member List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Local Affairs
Discussion of current events and issues around us.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2008, 12:21 AM   #1 (permalink)
richardsng_era
HP: +65-92993342
richardsng_era is on a distinguished road
 
richardsng_era's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,158
iTrader: (0)
Gender:
Location: Tampines
Total SGC$: 2,247.97
Default "I’m in Singapore," claim phantom fraudsters

Channel NewsAsia - Friday, June 6

SINGAPORE: Duped by fraudsters in a credit card scam, American businessman Steve Mozena was astonished to discover the transaction apparently originated from a country reputedly tough on crime — Singapore.

"As a result, I have been cheated out of nearly US$9,000 (S$12,300), which is a large amount for a small business like mine," wrote Mr Mozena, who owns a small medical equipment and supplies store in California, in an email last week to Today.

He is not alone: Since 2002, various reports have surfaced of credit card—related scams committed by companies or individuals purporting to be in Singapore. The Commercial Affairs Department has received more than 70 complaints from online merchants overseas since 2003.

However, on Thursday, a Monetary Authority of Singapore representative denied that such cases are on the rise.

The spokesperson pointed out: "The cards used in such schemes may have been issued from anywhere in the world, and any number of countries could be used as transit, forwarding or distribution for goods purchased through card—not—present fraud schemes."

The police believe the fraudsters are not based in Singapore.

Since January last year, the US Embassy has carried an advisory on its website urging online sellers to check the legitimacy of the cards if they get an order supposedly from Singapore.

But wherever the real origins of the fraudsters, their actions present a nightmare for small time businessmen like Mr Mozena, as credit card companies inform them of the swindle only after the goods are shipped, in some cases weeks later.

While the legitimate cardholders are not liable for the charges, the business is responsible for a "charge back" — a reversal of a credit card transaction to the merchant.

To make matters worse, they also no longer have control over the items sold. Said Mr Mozena: "I have contacted my insurance broker to see if my business insurance covers the loss. Though if it does, it’s likely my insurance premiums will go up."

The US Embassy advisory cautions traders that orders — placed via telephone or online and usually in the region of US$5,000 to US$30,000 — sent to Singapore could be redistributed elsewhere and, if this happens, the cost of recovering the goods is "prohibitive".

When contacted, the embassy was not able to give any indication of the number of cases reported, as "any crimes that take place in Singapore are under the exclusive purview of the Singaporean authorities".

A police spokesperson told TODAY that between 2002 and 2003, the fraudsters’ modus operandi was to simply add "Singapore" as part of the shipment consignee’s address, even though they were located elsewhere.

But from 2004 on, these cheats began using the contact details of bona fide freight forwarding companies in Singapore as the consignee. Once the shipments arrived in Singapore, the cargo would be redirected elsewhere.

As such, the CAD has been working closely with US law enforcement agencies and regional police forces, other government agencies and industry players through fraud information sharing.

They have also helped victims recover goods worth more than US$350,000, said the police spokesperson.

Despite these efforts, traders like Mr Mozena continue to fall prey to such cons. The police say, public education is the best way to convey the message: Online traders can protect themselves by exercising “greater caution when processing orders from questionable customers who place exceptionally large or unusual orders, provide questionable contact details or multiple credit card numbers for payment”.

Mr Mozena admits that he was not as careful as he could have been. "My company has been in operation for less than a year and my website was not yet secure," he explained.

"These credit card criminals obviously prey on websites not yet finished or secure. But does this make it my fault for being too trusting, especially in dealing with people apparently from a country that is known to crack down hard on crime?"

Meanwhile, the MAS is collaborating with the banking industry to keep an eye on the issue.

"Banks are required to have in place robust fraud detection and prevention controls, as well as remedial procedures to minimise the incidence of credit card fraud," said their spokesperson. — TODAY/sh


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by richardsng_era : 07-06-2008 at 12:23 AM.
richardsng_era is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

SGC$ Per Thread View: 0
SGC$ Per Thread: 2.00
SGC$ Per Reply: 1.00

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Woodlands "clean" or "dirty". pls share your opion? DivinitySky Supernatural Zone 104 09-11-2008 01:45 PM
2 Job Opportunities: "Operations Executive" and "Windows + Exchange System Engineer" Talent Logic Jobs & Services 0 05-02-2008 06:57 PM
How to translate this Chinese words "MA HOU PAO" or "马后炮" in English ajin_chaw SGClub Cafe 21 24-01-2008 01:58 PM
BIG problem with Logitech playgear "protective" case (its "equivalent" to be precise) wwenze PSP General Discussion 14 09-12-2007 09:22 PM
"Waiting to claim its victim ..." violette Local Affairs 6 25-03-2007 07:15 AM

» Current Poll
Type of School Attended, Preference for Children?
Attended Single-sex, Prefer Single-Sex Schools - 15.45%
36 Votes
Attended Single-sex, Don't Mind Either - 7.73%
18 Votes
Attended Single-sex, Prefer Mixed Schools - 4.72%
11 Votes
Attended Mixed, Prefer Single-sex Schools - 6.44%
15 Votes
Attended Mixed, Don't Mind Either - 18.88%
44 Votes
Attended Mixed, Prefer Mixed Schools - 46.78%
109 Votes
Total Votes: 233
You may not vote on this poll.
» Friends
Funny Videos
Free Wallpapers
Singapore Christian
Start Your Website
Copyright© 2004-2008 SGClub.com. All rights reserved.
Ad Management by RedTyger & Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

        All times are GMT +8. The time now is 02:29 PM.


SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.