Go Back   Singapore's Online Community - Singapore Forums > Current Affairs > Foreign Affairs
Register FAQ Member List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Foreign Affairs
Discussion of any foreign affairs around the world.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2008, 07:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
*StarDust*
Experienced SGClubber
*StarDust* is on a distinguished road
 
*StarDust*'s Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,189
iTrader: (0)
Gender:
Location: Woodlands
Total SGC$: 40.90
Default Archaeologists hope first Stonehenge dig in 44 years will unravel mysteries

Archaeologists hope first Stonehenge dig in 44 years will unravel mysteries

LONDON - SOME of England's most sacred soil was disturbed on Monday for the first time in more than four decades as archeologists try to solve the enduring riddle of Stonehenge: When and why was the prehistoric monument built?

The excavation project, set to last until April 11, is designed to unearth materials that can be used to establish a firm date for when the first, mysterious set of bluestones was put in place at Stonehenge, one of Britain's best known and least understood landmarks.

The UNESCO World Heritage site, a favourite with visitors the world over, has become popular with Druids, neo-Pagans and New Agers who attach mystical significance to the strangely-shaped circle of stones, but there remains great debate about the actual purpose of the structure.

The dig will be led by Mr Timothy Darvill, a leading Stonehenge scholar from Bournemouth University, and Mr Geoffrey Wainwright, President of the Society of Antiquaries.

Both experts have worked to pinpoint the site in the Preseli Mountains in south Wales where the bluestones came from. They will be able to compare the samples found in Wales to those at Stonehenge on the Salisbury Plain.

'The excavation will date the arrival of the bluestones following their 250 kilometre journey from Preseli to Salisbury Plain and contribute to our definition of the society which undertook such an ambitious project.' Mr Wainright said. 'We will be able to say not only why, but when the first stone monument was built.'

Scientists believe that the bluestones were put in place about 2600 B.C. and removed 200 years later, but they concede the date is only an approximation at best.

Mr Darvill said the excavation marks the first opportunity to bring the power of modern scientific archaeology to bear on a problem that has taxed the minds of so many experts since medieval times: Why were the bluestones so important to have warranted bringing them from so far away?

The excavation goal is to find remnants of the original bluestones, or related materials, that can be subjected to modern radiocarbon dating techniques to establish a more precise timeline for the construction of Stonehenge, said Mr Dave Batchelor, an archaeologist with English Heritage, which oversees the Stonehenge site.

'We have to find the material that will give us a good date,' he said. 'That's where the luck comes in. We could get an absolute blank or we could get something magnificent or we could get something in between.'

He said bluestones actually have an 'inky, bluey, black' appearance and come only from the Preseli Mountains in South Wales.

Research will allow scientists to grasp how monument was built
It is hoped that fixing the date of the start of construction with more precision will allow scientists to finally grasp how and why the monument was built.

They also may learn more about how the stones were transported.

Research shows the bluestones, weighing an estimated five tons apiece, may have been dragged from the mountains in south Wales to the sea, put on huge rafts, and floated up the River Avon.

Archaeologists believe that before the bluestones were put in place, Stonehenge consisted of a circle of wooden posts and timbers built in approximately 3100 B.C.

The research that began on Monday with the digging of a trench marks the first time ground inside the inner stone circle has been excavated since 1964. The area, revered as a powerful link to England's pagan past, is so sensitive that Cabinet approval was needed before the work could begin.

Ms Renee Fok, a spokeswoman with English Heritage, said the project was okayed only after experts were convinced of its potential value.

She said the project represents 'the logical next step' after the two professors located the source of the bluestones in Wales.

'It's the culmination of their work, it makes sense to go back to the stone circle and get a date,' she said. 'We want to strike a balance. We want the best research, but we can't just say go ahead and dig as you like, it's a very fragile area. Even the Druids are happy with this project, we've spoken to them and they don't object.'

She said tourists will be able to visit Stonehenge as usual and will also be able to watch live video coverage of the excavation in special tents at the site. -- AP


Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/Latest%2...ry_222580.html
*StarDust* is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

SGC$ Per Thread View: 0
SGC$ Per Thread: 2.00
SGC$ Per Reply: 1.00

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7 mysteries on earth RED.ADEN Supernatural Zone 31 16-03-2008 10:01 PM
Greatest Mysteries: Does Alien Life Exist? irenetan Supernatural Zone 32 16-11-2007 02:35 PM
Greatest Mysteries: Who Are You? yvonnetan782 Local Affairs 3 10-08-2007 09:09 AM
Unravel the Magic Tricks... shingshing Cool Funny Videos 7 02-08-2007 07:02 PM
Like it or not - most women dig bad boys Adguy Love & Relationships 20 19-06-2007 12:13 AM

» Current Poll
Are Parents Irresponsible if They Smoked Around Their Kids?
Yes, definitely! There is no Excuse! - 63.16%
108 Votes
Yes, but maybe excusable - 16.96%
29 Votes
No, they may not agree/know of the harm - 7.02%
12 Votes
No, it is their choice how they want their kids raised. - 12.87%
22 Votes
Total Votes: 171
You may not vote on this poll.
» Friends
Funny Videos
Free Wallpapers
Singapore Christian
Start Your Website
Copyright© 2004-2008 SGClub.com. All rights reserved.
Ad Management by RedTyger & Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

        All times are GMT +8. The time now is 08:03 AM.


SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.