<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should ‘Avatar’ Sweep the 2010 Oscars?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sgclub.com/lifestyle/should-%e2%80%98avatar%e2%80%99-sweep-the-2010-oscars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sgclub.com/lifestyle/should-%e2%80%98avatar%e2%80%99-sweep-the-2010-oscars/</link>
	<description>Life, Love &#38; Relationships</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:28:19 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fweetreena</title>
		<link>http://www.sgclub.com/lifestyle/should-%e2%80%98avatar%e2%80%99-sweep-the-2010-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Fweetreena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgclub.com/sgchome/?p=607#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I agree with wilson completely. There are instances when the Academy favours box-office hits over good movies that didn&#039;t do so well. The Hurt Locker is good, that I cannot deny, but Avatar&#039;s box-office success will escalate its chances of winning Best Picture. 

Also, the battle of Sandra Bullock VS Meryl Streep is aptly put. 

Wilson, ignore hater comments and continue writing good reviews!

fwee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with wilson completely. There are instances when the Academy favours box-office hits over good movies that didn&#8217;t do so well. The Hurt Locker is good, that I cannot deny, but Avatar&#8217;s box-office success will escalate its chances of winning Best Picture. </p>
<p>Also, the battle of Sandra Bullock VS Meryl Streep is aptly put. </p>
<p>Wilson, ignore hater comments and continue writing good reviews!</p>
<p>fwee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylar</title>
		<link>http://www.sgclub.com/lifestyle/should-%e2%80%98avatar%e2%80%99-sweep-the-2010-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgclub.com/sgchome/?p=607#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I agree with the comment above. It is fine if you wish to praise Hurt Locker to the high heavens in a subtle manner, but you exercise very bad judgment when you relegate Avatar to mere &quot;box-office successes&quot;, thereby implying it&#039;s a mediocre film relative to Hurt Locker, and that a certain tyranny of the majority is at work here. In that single paragraph, you&#039;ve managed to downplay the Star Wars of the millenium, metaphorically slap the great James Cameron AND insult the professional ethics and integrity of the members that comprises the academy awards panel. Well done, Mr. Wilson Ng.

Indeed, what heresy is this? 

AVATAR FTW!!!!1111!!!one
...

P.S Yes, a lifestyle in which the biggest judgment you have to make is whether to eat at spec mess or canteen would be more suited.

(hello wilson! lol)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the comment above. It is fine if you wish to praise Hurt Locker to the high heavens in a subtle manner, but you exercise very bad judgment when you relegate Avatar to mere &#8220;box-office successes&#8221;, thereby implying it&#8217;s a mediocre film relative to Hurt Locker, and that a certain tyranny of the majority is at work here. In that single paragraph, you&#8217;ve managed to downplay the Star Wars of the millenium, metaphorically slap the great James Cameron AND insult the professional ethics and integrity of the members that comprises the academy awards panel. Well done, Mr. Wilson Ng.</p>
<p>Indeed, what heresy is this? </p>
<p>AVATAR FTW!!!!1111!!!one<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S Yes, a lifestyle in which the biggest judgment you have to make is whether to eat at spec mess or canteen would be more suited.</p>
<p>(hello wilson! lol)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary</title>
		<link>http://www.sgclub.com/lifestyle/should-%e2%80%98avatar%e2%80%99-sweep-the-2010-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgclub.com/sgchome/?p=607#comment-53</guid>
		<description>&quot;the Academy probably needs to hold their viewership, and that is to reward the audience-favourite.&quot;

What heresy is this? To even imply that the sublime beauty of Avatar could be overshadowed by this &quot;Locker of Hurt&quot; borders on madness and blasphemy.

Smite the unbeliever!

...

P.S.

you suck as writer and should have signed on with the SAF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the Academy probably needs to hold their viewership, and that is to reward the audience-favourite.&#8221;</p>
<p>What heresy is this? To even imply that the sublime beauty of Avatar could be overshadowed by this &#8220;Locker of Hurt&#8221; borders on madness and blasphemy.</p>
<p>Smite the unbeliever!</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S.</p>
<p>you suck as writer and should have signed on with the SAF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 Oscar Predictions: SGClub Portal (Feb, 2010) &#171; WhatWilsonWrites</title>
		<link>http://www.sgclub.com/lifestyle/should-%e2%80%98avatar%e2%80%99-sweep-the-2010-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 Oscar Predictions: SGClub Portal (Feb, 2010) &#171; WhatWilsonWrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgclub.com/sgchome/?p=607#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] Should ‘Avatar’ Sweep the 2010 Oscars? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should ‘Avatar’ Sweep the 2010 Oscars? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.sgclub.com

Served from: www.sgclub.com @ 2012-02-09 13:20:48 -->
