| Quote: | | | Originally Posted by REV300 | | | | |
| What is the unsuccessful reason? What do your friend not like about it? What kind of lane condition he used it on?
True. Leverage, timing and hand position at point of release play a more important role in determining rev rate, not forgetting hand speed as well. There was an interesting debate in the past about whether bigger hands can generate more rev with less effort.
Just curious, do you know of or see anyone using sarge easter grip in Singapore? Should be interesting to see an asian using Rico drill + Sarge easter combo. | |
| | |
mi lor...i tried on my roto grip mercury...
and with a finger hole for the pinkie as well
i mean the sarge easter grip...
nice to bowl but a lot of stress on the ring finger cos its the conventional grip and u know w/o the rubber inserts its painful esp when we have been using inserts for so long
as for rico..i tried it b4....the ball driller must know where to place the mass bias cos i tried on 2 balls...1 worked extremely well,the other did not cos i tried it for experimenting purposes 2 years back....
nvr stuck to it anyways cos i rather have high rev rate than to cut down on the rev rate (anyways as a bowler,he/she sud be versatile enuff to know how to be versatile in releases)..if i need to drill the ball weak,i might as well use an entry level or mid range ball better,imagine buying a ferarri and only driving it 50kph all the time,waste of money and spoil the car....
if u know the formula for creating rev rate,u would know that bigger hands are able to generate more rev...thats why each bowler must develop a style of bowling suitable for their physique to realise the full potential of their bowling.....
