| Quote: | | | Originally Posted by yingielicious | | | |
| hey im studyin at ftc kaplan now. but im taking CAT. and i have a fren frm SAA currently taking CAT and she says tt e SAA lecturers sucks.
and i tot my sch had lotsa china peep already. she told mi tt SAA had even more! | |
| | |
Hmmm, that's kind of prejudice isn't it? Afterall we attend lesson to learn, not to choose who are around us...
I'm taking ACCA at SAA/FTC. Just finished exam for paper 2.4, 2.5, 2.6. I've compared both schools and I find that not all lecturers at FTC are great. I would say Saminathan at FTC is good. As for easier papers like 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, I recommend SAA since cheaper and have great lecturers like Tan Mee Ling & an indian lawyer (sorry forgot his name). P2.6, I'll recommend philip woo from SAA. (my favourite lecturer)
As for P2.4 & 2.5, i find Sami from FTC better tho people say James Kwan from SAA good. [ I've attended both lecturers lessons and I find Sami is more focused while James is more thorough. ]